Did NATO cause the Russia-Ukraine crisis?

Almost the whole world is following the development of the situation in Russia and Ukraine in the media. In order to understand the outbreak of the current crisis, we need to go back in time to get the right perspective on this issue. It is historical and almost forgotten perspective that I will explore in my article. First of all, I would like to emphasise strongly that I am neither for nor against anyone, but I am trying to take a neutral approach to this issue. I understand that my writing may cause strong negative feelings, because the truth is not very popular in this world. However, I do not claim to know 100% of the truth about the Russia-Ukraine crisis, but we can clearly see some truthful steps in history to understand this current crisis. Study and test the message of what I have written. Be open to searching for what is the truth.

The title of my article is: Did NATO cause the Russia-Ukraine crisis? In order to better understand the question of the title, we need to see and understand the reason for the creation of NATO. NATO was founded on 4 April 1949.

NATO's own website explains the reason for the creation of NATO as follows:

It is often said that the North Atlantic Treaty Organization was founded in response to the threat posed by the Soviet Union. This is only partially true. In fact, the Alliance’s creation was part of a broader effort to serve three purposes: deterring Soviet expansionism, forbidding the revival of nationalist militarism in Europe through a strong North American presence on the continent, and encouraging European political integration.

NATO itself recognises that NATO was also set up partly to deter the Soviet threat, the Soviet expansionist ambitions, but also to prevent the resurgence of nationalist militarism and to promote political integration in Europe.

NATO recognises that NATO is also established to prevent the threat and expansionist ambitions of the Soviet Union (now Russia). This is a very important point. One of NATO's core activities is to seek to control Russia and the threat it causes.

It is said that the Warsaw Pact was formed in May 1955 during the Cold War as a reaction to West Germany's entry into NATO. The Warsaw Pact was a defence pact between the Soviet Union and seven other Eastern Bloc socialist republics in Central and Eastern Europe. The Warsaw Pact was abolished on 1 July 1991. It is truly remarkable that NATO was founded before the Warsaw Pact. NATO took the first step in fighting its "enemy", which was the Soviet Union (now Russia), to which the Soviet Union responded six years after establishing of NATO.

The next question should be: if the Warsaw Pact has been abolished, by what justification does NATO continue to operate, and not abolish itself, when its counterpart and "enemy", the Warsaw Pact, abolished itself?

An interesting answer to the above question can be found in a 1999 interview with Monsignor Marinelli of the Catholic Church (Monsignor is a Catholic title), in which Marinelli says the following:

... I read a book of 500 pages and it is something to make the skin cringe… the UN is a conclusion of the purpose of Freemasonry of 1717, NATO is a conclusion of what was proclaimed, the same dollar bears exposed the pyramid, which is the coat of arms of Freemasonry and many other things… such as for UNESCO and organizations that want to eliminate the power of States and “regionalize” them, as happened in the Balkans, they want to regionalize it in order to better dominate them. .. It is time to move towards a universal government, a world government in which there are the most important religions, where it is accepted that the “universal architect” is this supreme being who can be called Christ, Allah, Jehovah. The important thing is to get to the global government of the world.

The goal of NATO is to achieve one universal world government, a creation of Freemasons. NATO is quite right when it says that NATO was created not only partly to deter the Soviet threat, but also for the political integration of Europe. The political integration of Europe is one step towards the creation of one world government. Marinelli's statement is in line with NATO's aspirations. Mr. Marinelli, a Catholic, is a special kind of Catholic because he dares to talk about Nato's Masonic connections and NATO's goal of a one world government.

When the Warsaw Pact was abolished, NATO promised of that time Soviet Union (now Russia) that it would not expand eastwards. Today, many people say that NATO expanding eastwards meant not expanding into East Germany. I don't think the Soviet leaders of that time just accepted the idea that NATO would not expand into East Germany, but it could expand into the rest of Europe. There are many views on this, but what is certain is that when the Warsaw Pact abolished, it wanted guarantees that NATO would not expand to threaten of that time Soviet Union (now Russia).

NATO has not abolished itself, although its counterpart, the Warsaw Pact, did, and despite this, NATO is also seeking to expand towards the borders of present-day Russia, because NATO is committed to the formation of a Masonic one-world government, one of the steps of which is the political integration of European countries (the European Union is proof of this).

I am not against anyone, I am not for anyone, but the evidence shows that NATO is guilty of the Russia-Ukraine conflict because NATO is keeping the door open to Ukraine's membership of NATO and is therefore against Russia and considers Russia a threat to itself. NATO's efforts have forced Vladimir Putin to respond to NATO's actions and Putin, from Russia's point of view, has no choice but to try to secure his country's borders against NATO.

The Western media and the politicians of the Western world have made Putin the big bad boy, when in reality the bigger and badder boy is NATO and the Masonic agenda behind it to create a one world government. No man is flawless, not even Putin and Russia have its own problems just as every other country in the world has its own problems and needs to be fixed. When Putin has announced and hinted that the borders of the former Soviet Union and the historic Russia that preceded it should be restored, it is a counter measure to NATO's expansionist ambitions.

Russia's possible intentions to return certain territories to Russian control are not right from the point of view of the sovereignty of these certain territories, but NATO's actions leave Russia with no other option if it wants to secure itself against the threat and expansionist ambitions of NATO.

NATO and the Masonic connection behind it sees Russia as a threat to it because Russia is an obstacle to the establishment of a one-world government whose religious leadership would be meant to the Pope of the Catholic Church. Catholicism has been in a race with the Orthodox Church to see who can take over the souls of the people. In the history of Ukraine, this race, orchestrated by the Jesuits, is clearly visible. Orthodoxy is in power in Russia. The religious and political thought and worldview in Russia is different from the vision based on the Masonic worldview.

Catholicism is a syncretistic religion, which means that it accepts all other religions and beliefs alongside it as a "way of salvation", even if it considers itself a more perfect "way of salvation". For this reason, Catholicism is ideally suited as the figurehead of a one-world government religion, as it is the path of religious unification towards one world government. NATO's ambition is to bring about the political unification of Europe as a stepping stone to the establishment of a one world government. The Catholic Church, NATO and the Freemasons have the same goal: the formation of one world government.
 

In the light of Bible prophecy, there will be one world government, led by the Antichrist. Likewise, in the light of Bible prophecy, we see how Russia, China and certain Arab states will attack Israel in the end-time Great War in the Middle East. This means that at some point the so-called Western world, under the leadership of the USA, will have to give up its role as "world police" and Russia, China and certain Arab countries will gain military supremacy in the world. How all of the above will come to pass in its entirety remains to be seen in the coming days, perhaps very soon. The Bible does indeed speak of a false peace with Israel, but this peace is based on deception and will lead to war against Israel, from which, according to Bible prophecy, Israel will emerge victorious with God's help.

As Finns, we are interested in what will happen to Finland in the coming days. As I see it, Russia will occupy at least some parts of Finland. Why would Russia occupy Finland? The reason is very simple Finland and Russia share a border of about 1300 km and Russia wants to ensure that the Finnish-Russian border does not become the border between NATO and Russia. At some point Russia will invade Finland, at least certain parts of Finland, through which Russia will secure its own border against NATO.

Throughout the ages, many prophecies have come from the spiritual field of Finland among the disciples of the Lord Jesus concerning how Russia will occupy Finland. When I was doing the ministry the Lord gave me in Russian Karelia in the early 2000's, I had a clear and powerful dream that needs to be tested whether it is of the Lord or not.

In this dream, I was shown the border between Finland and Russia, especially the Karelian regions and St. Petersburg. I heard talking on both sides of the border and then suddenly a map of Finland appeared in front of me with huge chains (handcuffs) in the middle. The dream ended there.

There is a strong possibility that Russia will occupy Finland. Possible reasons for occupation could be if Finland were about to join or would join NATO, Russia might want a military base for end-time military operations, e.g. when it plans to invade the land of Israel. Another reason could be that because the Finnish people have rejected God and accepted all kinds of lies and sin, God is allowing the occupier to penalize Finland so that many would seek salvation in the Lord Jesus through this punishment. Of course, there may be other reasons, but in the light of end-time warfare and events, it may be possible and very likely that Russia will occupy Finland.

I am not trying to cause fear and panic in anyone's heart, but according to the Bible it is a fact that the world will be plunged into a great war in the last days, and it is of course obvious that Finland will also be in some sort of position in this matter.

Finland should remain militarily non-aligned, because non-alignment is the best guarantee for Finland to stay out of military conflicts. Russia does not want Finland to join NATO, because then NATO would become Russia's "border neighbour". Russia would not benefit from occupying Finland in the present situation, because by occupying Finland, Russia would be one step closer to a NATO "border neighbour", which it certainly does not want. From this point of view, Finland's military non-alignment would be the best possible solution for us Finns, because remaining outside the military alliances would make Finland a neutral and neutral region (buffer state) which Russia would not perceive as a threat to itself in any way.

When and if Finland were a buffer state between Russia and NATO, Finland as a buffer state region would very probably ensure that no military conflicts would take place on Finnish territory. If Finland were to join NATO and war broke out between NATO and Russia, so Finland as a border neighbour with NATO and Russia, would probably suffer the heaviest losses and damage. Russia would be forced to hammer and strike hard at the NATO country on the other side of the border. As a neutral country, if war broke out between Russia and NATO, Finland would not suffer that kind of devastation if it were not a NATO member state. A neutral country could survive with little damage if war would break out.

Russia can also beforehand occupy Finland before joining NATO, but time will tell how this will happen and take shape. Even if this current situation between Russia, Ukraine and NATO does not lead to a military conflict yet, some kind of military conflict is coming in the coming days. This future conflict may take a broader form than it has now.

If Russia were to occupy neutral Finland, the damage and harm would be much less than if Finland were a member of NATO. If Russia and NATO were to go to war against each other, NATO Finland would suffer greater losses and worse damage than if neutral Finland were to be drawn into the tumult of battle and the war. As a neutral country, we would also send a message to others that we are not prepared for war and do not support any kind of military alliance against anyone. Many neutral countries in history have avoided the horrors of war. Of course, this is not always the case, but as a neutral country, there is a greater chance of avoiding the horrors of war than as a member of a military alliance.

The current political leadership in Finland is largely pro-NATO. NATO will not bring security to Finland, because joining NATO would lead to a major disaster for Finland. The current political leadership will be responsible for Finland's horrible fate if and when Finland plans to join NATO.

Finally, I would like to point out that since NATO's aim is the unification of Europe and the whole world, which, according to the teaching of the Bible, is an attempt to establish an anti-Christian new world order on earth, no disciple of the Lord Jesus who loves the Lord Jesus in truth should be in favour of joining NATO. NATO is the building of an end-time beast empire.

The very best thing an individual can do is to confess his sins to God and believe that Jesus is Lord, Saviour and Messiah, raised from the dead by God the Father. When and if a person believes in the Lord Jesus, as the Bible teaches, he will receive forgiveness of sins through the blood of Jesus and the atoning work of Jesus, eternal life and fellowship with the God of the Bible.

Petri Paavola 23.2.2022